Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Dual-Process Theory of Moral Judgments: A Way of Explaining Why VMPFC Patients Make More Utilitarian Judgments in Relation to Harmful Situations
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för biovetenskap.
2014 (engelsk)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 10 poäng / 15 hpOppgave
Abstract [en]

According to Joshua Greene’s dual-process theory, our moral judgments are processed in one of two systems in the brain referred to as the emotional (quick, unconscious) and rational (slow, conscious) system. The reason for why people tend to answer differently in the footbridge dilemma compared to the trolley dilemma is because the emotional system is dominating over the rational system. Research has demonstrated that patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage make more utilitarian judgments in moral dilemmas in relation to harmful situations. According to the dual-process theory, this is because the emotional system has been impaired which results in that the only working system is the rational system. The aim of this thesis is to investigate how the dual-process theory tries to explain why our moral judgments tend to differ in some moral dilemmas. This thesis will also look at how the dual-process theory tries to explain why patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage make utilitarian judgments in relation to harmful situations. This thesis will sustain that the dual-process theory have gained strong empirical support, especially from the research that has been made on patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage. This thesis will also argue that some modifications needs to be made on the dual-process theory in order to make it stronger. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2014. , s. 50
Emneord [en]
VMPFC, Moral Judgments, Dual-process theory, Trolley dilemma, Footbridge dilemma
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-9423OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-9423DiVA, id: diva2:723954
Fag / kurs
Cognitive Neuroscience
Utdanningsprogram
Consciousness Studies - Philosophy and Neuropsychology
Veileder
Examiner
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-09-01 Laget: 2014-06-11 Sist oppdatert: 2014-09-01bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(728 kB)4969 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 728 kBChecksum SHA-512
af275d12c445220aa83298efb4e7601e50f1f3dcb5ddc1d5fa064c7a3053cefd450b28086a8d816e2755d07e2156228b40fed08becdd2fae932c1ff5468d365d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 4969 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 680 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf