his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Salience of Outcome and Procedure in Giving and Receiving Universalistic and Particularistic Resources
Department of Psychology, University of Leiden, Wassenaarseweg, Netherlands.
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för teknik och samhälle.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7164-0433
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för teknik och samhälle.
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: Handbook of social resource theory: theoretical extensions, empirical insights, and social applications / [ed] Kjell Törnblom, Ali Kazemi, New York: Springer, 2012, s. 397-405Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

As Riël Vermunt, Ali Kazemi, and Kjell Törnblom point out in this chapter, resource allocations may be judged on the basis of the resulting final outcome and/or the procedures applied to arrive at the outcome. The focus of this chapter is on how attention to the outcome or procedure is affected by the nature of the allocated resource (universalistic versus particularistic) and the direction of allocation (when P is a provider versus a recipient). Results from a cross-national survey study involving respondents from Austria, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the USA showed that procedure was perceived as more focal in the allocation of universalistic as compared to particularistic resources. No differences were observed with regard to the salience of outcome. Interestingly, this held only true for resource providers; for resource recipients, this pattern was reversed. These and other findings suggest that the meaning of resource classes (in this study money and love) differ for providers and recipients in their judgments of allocation events. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for SRT and for future research.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
New York: Springer, 2012. s. 397-405
Serie
Critical issues in social justice, ISSN 1572-1906
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Humaniora-samhällsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-7198DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_25ISBN: 978-1-4614-4174-8 ISBN: 978-1-4614-4175-5 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-7198DiVA, id: diva2:604532
Tilgjengelig fra: 2013-02-11 Laget: 2013-02-11 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-27bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Personposter BETA

Vermunt, RiëlKazemi, AliTörnblom, Kjell

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Vermunt, RiëlKazemi, AliTörnblom, Kjell
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1156 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf