his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What we need from an embodied cognitive architecture
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för informationsteknologi. Högskolan i Skövde, Forskningscentrum för Informationsteknologi. University of Plymouth, United Kingdom. (Interaction Lab)ORCID-id: 0000-0003-1177-4119
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Cognitive Architectures / [ed] Maria Isabel Aldinhas Ferreira, João Silva Sequeira, Rodrigo Ventura, Cham: Springer, 2019, s. 43-57Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Given that original purpose of cognitive architectures was to lead to a unified theory of cognition, this chapter considers the possible contributions that cognitive architectures can make to embodied theories of cognition in particular. This is not a trivial question since the field remains very much divided about what embodied cognition actually means, and we will see some example positions in this chapter. It is then argued that a useful embodied cognitive architecture would be one that can demonstrate (a) what precisely the role of the body in cognition actually is, and (b) whether a body is constitutively needed at all for some (or all) cognitive processes. It is proposed that such questions can be investigated if the cognitive architecture is designed so that consequences of varying the precise embodiment on higher cognitive mechanisms can be explored. This is in contrast with, for example, those cognitive architectures in robotics that are designed for specific bodies first; or architectures in cognitive science that implement embodiment as an add-on to an existing framework (because then, that framework is by definition not constitutively shaped by the embodiment). The chapter concludes that the so-called semantic pointer architecture by Eliasmith and colleagues may be one framework that satisfies our desiderata and may be well-suited for studying theories of embodied cognition further.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Cham: Springer, 2019. s. 43-57
Serie
Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, ISSN 2213-8986, E-ISSN 2213-8994 ; 94
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Interaction Lab (ILAB); INF302 Autonoma intelligenta system
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16167DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97550-4_4ISI: 000465469800005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85051464325ISBN: 978-3-319-97549-8 (tryckt)ISBN: 978-3-319-97550-4 (digital)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-16167DiVA, id: diva2:1246440
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-09-07 Laget: 2018-09-07 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-11bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Thill, Serge

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Thill, Serge
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 3168 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf