Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Future Sepsis Diagnosis: Difference between manual and Semi-automatic extraction methods and quantifying unknown miRNA
University of Skövde, School of Bioscience.
2023 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Sepsis is defined by the body's inflammatory response to infection. It is a rapidly progressive condition in which a systemic response to an infection mediated by endogenous mediators, can result in a broad inflammatory reaction in organs distant from the actual injury and end in endorgan dysfunction or even failure. As of a 2020 study, sepsis remains the leading cause of death inhospitals. Currently, a single test for the diagnosis of sepsis does not exist, therefore hospitals rely on testing a combination of vital parameters and observing common symptoms associated with sepsis. However, these methods are often time-consuming, making them fatal for the patients. The University of Skövde is looking into combining different biomarkers into one multimarker panel. Their current research focuses on miRNA as a potential biomarker for sepsis. Despite being a promising field, miRNA extraction from plasma has its difficulties. The study extracted miRNA using miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Advanced Kit (Qiagen) kit and QIAcube (Qiagen) to determine whether manual or semi-automatic extraction is better in terms of time, quality, and quantity. The second aim of the study was to quantify and identify miR-Seps 3 using the RT-qPCR method. The two methods of extraction quality, quantity, and time did not have a significant difference. TheRT-qPCR method was able to amplify miR-Seps 3, though further research is needed on whether the miRNA can be a possible candidate for multimarker panel.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. , p. 29
National Category
Medical Bioscience
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23200OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-23200DiVA, id: diva2:1796515
Subject / course
Bioscience
Educational program
Bioscience - Molecular Biodesign
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-09-12 Created: 2023-09-12 Last updated: 2023-09-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

By organisation
School of Bioscience
Medical Bioscience

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 89 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf