his.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Törnblom, Kjell
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 46) Show all publications
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2016). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2016 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 29(4)
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Individual and Society VIDSOC
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13184 (URN)
Available from: 2016-12-02 Created: 2016-12-02 Last updated: 2019-09-10Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2016). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2016 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 29(3)
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Individual and Society VIDSOC
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13183 (URN)
Available from: 2016-12-02 Created: 2016-12-02 Last updated: 2019-09-10Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2016). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2016 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 29(2)
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology) Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Individual and Society VIDSOC
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13182 (URN)
Available from: 2016-12-02 Created: 2016-12-02 Last updated: 2019-09-10Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2016). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2016 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2016
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 29(1)
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Individual and Society VIDSOC
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13181 (URN)
Available from: 2016-12-02 Created: 2016-12-02 Last updated: 2019-09-18Bibliographically approved
Kimmo, E., Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (2015). A New Look at Individual Differences in Perceptions of Unfairness: The Theory of Maximally Unfair Allocations in Multiparty Situations. Social Justice Research, 28(4), 401-414
Open this publication in new window or tab >>A New Look at Individual Differences in Perceptions of Unfairness: The Theory of Maximally Unfair Allocations in Multiparty Situations
2015 (English)In: Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466, E-ISSN 1573-6725, Vol. 28, no 4, p. 401-414Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous research has demonstrated that unfairness judgments of resource allocations become more complex when there are more than two recipients. In order to explain some of this complexity, we propose a set of psychological mechanisms that may underlie four different choices of maximally unfair resource allocations (MUA): Self-Single-Loser, Self-One-Loser-of-Many, Self-Single-Winner, and Self-One-Winner-of-Many. From this psychological theory, several predictions are derived and tested in vignette studies involving a total of 708 participants recruited online using MTurk. As predicted by our theory, (1) choices of MUA where there is a single loser were much more common when the allocated resource was of negative rather than positive valence, and (2) the amount of egoistic bias individuals exhibited when judging the unfairness in receiving a small rather than a large share in a non-extreme multi-party allocation was predicted by their choices of MUA. These findings suggest that an individual’s choice of MUA reveals some generally relevant principles of how unfairness is perceived in multi-party allocations. This opens up new lines of inquiry, especially regarding research on social dilemmas and social value orientation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2015
Keywords
Unfairness, Distributive justice, Inequality, Multi-party allocation, Egoistic bias
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Social Psychology
Research subject
Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-12122 (URN)10.1007/s11211-015-0255-5 (DOI)000365744900001 ()2-s2.0-84948578049 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2016-04-19 Created: 2016-04-08 Last updated: 2019-08-28Bibliographically approved
Törnblom, K. & Kazemi, A. (2015). Distributive Justice: Revisiting Past Statements and Reflecting on Future Prospects. In: Russell S. Cropanzano & Maureen L. Ambrose (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace: (pp. 15-50). New York: Oxford University Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Distributive Justice: Revisiting Past Statements and Reflecting on Future Prospects
2015 (English)In: The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace / [ed] Russell S. Cropanzano & Maureen L. Ambrose, New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, p. 15-50Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter starts with brief discussions of the whens and whys of justice reasoning and acting, after which descriptions of several distributive justice theories are provided. These are analyzed on the basis of four dimensions: type of justice motivation, orientation of justice behavior, the source of justice behavior initiation, and the source of justice behavior direction. We suggest that the overemphasis in the distributive justice literature on the three principles of equity, equality, and need, ought to be tempered by finer distinctions among the varieties of each and increased attention to additional principles and combinations of principles. The chapter ends by outlining suggestions for future research. Four issues are featured: the nature of the object (social resource) that is distributed and the focus of justice judgments, how the way the resource was produced may affect its allocation and justice judgment, how justice relates to various types of conflict, and why people sometimes do not react to perceived injustices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Oxford University Press, 2015
Keywords
justice models, distributive justice, justice principles, justice conflict, (non)reactions to injustice, resource allocation, resource production
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Social Psychology Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-12115 (URN)10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.2 (DOI)9780199981410 (ISBN)
Available from: 2016-04-08 Created: 2016-04-08 Last updated: 2019-08-29Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A., Törnblom, K. & Mikula, G. (2015). Justice: Social Psychological Perspectives (2ed.). In: James D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: (pp. 949-955). Oxford: Elsevier
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Justice: Social Psychological Perspectives
2015 (English)In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences / [ed] James D. Wright, Oxford: Elsevier, 2015, 2, p. 949-955Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This article discusses the concept of justice from a social psychological perspective. The authors begin by briefly outlining some theoretical precursors of current social psychological research on justice. Another part is devoted to an overview of theories and empirical research in the areas of distributive and procedural justice. The article furthermore addresses interactional justice, why people care about justice, and reactions to injustice in the context of which individual differences in conceptions of justice are briefly discussed. The article ends by discussing some current trends, social applications, and some future challenges in social psychological inquiries of social justice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Elsevier, 2015 Edition: 2
Keywords
Conflict, Distributive justice, Equality, Equity, Interactional justice, Just world hypothesis, Justice sensitivity, Procedural justice, Relative deprivation, Resource theory
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology) Social Psychology
Research subject
Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-12125 (URN)10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24019-1 (DOI)2-s2.0-84961231357 (Scopus ID)9780080970868 (ISBN)
Available from: 2016-04-19 Created: 2016-04-08 Last updated: 2019-09-25Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2015). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2015 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2015
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 28(2)
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences; Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10928 (URN)
Available from: 2015-05-12 Created: 2015-05-12 Last updated: 2019-09-18Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2015). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2015 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2015
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 28(1)
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences; Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10927 (URN)
Available from: 2015-05-12 Created: 2015-05-12 Last updated: 2019-09-18Bibliographically approved
Kazemi, A. & Törnblom, K. (Eds.). (2014). Social Justice Research. Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Social Justice Research
2014 (English)Collection (editor) (Other academic)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2014
Series
Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466 ; Vol. 27(2)
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences; Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10923 (URN)
Available from: 2015-05-12 Created: 2015-05-12 Last updated: 2019-09-18Bibliographically approved
Organisations

Search in DiVA

Show all publications