his.sePublications
Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Publications (10 of 75) Show all publications
van Laere, J. & Lindblom, J. (2019). Cultivating a longitudinal learning process through recurring crisis management training exercises in twelve Swedish municipalities. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 27(1), 38-49
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Cultivating a longitudinal learning process through recurring crisis management training exercises in twelve Swedish municipalities
2019 (English)In: Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, ISSN 0966-0879, E-ISSN 1468-5973, Vol. 27, no 1, p. 38-49Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study illustrates how crisis management capability is developed in series ofrecurring exercises, rather than in one single exercise. Over one hundred table-topand role-playing exercises were performed and evaluated in a longitudinal cross-caseaction research study in 12 Swedish municipalities. By consciously adapting trainingformats, municipalities were lead through three learning phases: obtaining roleunderstanding (phase 1: knowing what to do), developing information managementskills (phase 2: knowing how to do it), and mastering self-reflection in regular time-outs (phase 3: knowing when and why to do something). This final learning out-come, being able to concurrently execute, evaluate, and reorganize an ongoing crisismanagement performance, may be the most valuable capability of a crisis manage-ment organization when crisis strikes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2019
Keywords
crisis management, exercise, gaming, gaming simulation, learning, Sweden, training
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Research subject
Information Systems; Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-15893 (URN)10.1111/1468-5973.12230 (DOI)000459310900004 ()2-s2.0-85061907416 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, 0836/2005
Available from: 2018-06-30 Created: 2018-06-30 Last updated: 2019-03-08
Andreasson, R., Jansson, A. A. & Lindblom, J. (2019). Past and Future Challenges for Railway Research and the Role of a Systems Perspective. In: Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, Yushi Fujita (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018): Volume VII: Ergonomics in Design, Design for All, Activity Theories for Work Analysis and Design, Affective Design (pp. 1737-1746). Cham: Springer
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Past and Future Challenges for Railway Research and the Role of a Systems Perspective
2019 (English)In: Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018): Volume VII: Ergonomics in Design, Design for All, Activity Theories for Work Analysis and Design, Affective Design / [ed] Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, Yushi Fujita, Cham: Springer, 2019, p. 1737-1746Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Operational train traffic is dependent on an efficient traffic plan monitored and executed by the traffic controllers, the proficient maneuvering of the trains by the train drivers, and on the interaction, communication, and coordination between these two work roles. The railway research community, and the branch of industry itself, has called for an integrated systems perspective for the whole train traffic system to achieve an efficient performance. As human-human and human-technology interactions are natural parts of the socio-technical system of train traffic, the aim of this paper is to provide illustrative examples for why a systems perspective is needed for the future of railway research. Furthermore, we present the theoretical framework of distributed cognition (DCog) as a necessary addition to the theoretical and methodological toolbox of the Human Factors and Ergonomics (HF&E) discipline. To realize efficient and coordinated processes involved in organizing and executing operational train traffic, the paper proposes that the DCog framework should be implemented in the train traffic domain as a viable approach forward.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cham: Springer, 2019
Series
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, ISSN 2194-5357, E-ISSN 2194-5365 ; 824
Keywords
Train traffic, Distributed cognition, Safety-critical systems, Systems perspective
National Category
Interaction Technologies
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16044 (URN)10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_178 (DOI)2-s2.0-85052309815 (Scopus ID)978-3-319-96070-8 (ISBN)978-3-319-96071-5 (ISBN)
Note

20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Florence, 31st August and 1st September 2018

Available from: 2018-08-13 Created: 2018-08-13 Last updated: 2018-11-06Bibliographically approved
Kolbeinsson, A., Lagerstedt, E. & Lindblom, J. (2018). Classification of Collaboration Levels for Human-Robot Cooperation in Manufacturing. In: Peter Thorvald & Keith Case (Ed.), Peter Thorvald, Keith Case (Ed.), Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXII: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 11–13, 2018,  University of Skövde, Sweden. Paper presented at 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 11–13, 2018, University of Skövde, Sweden (pp. 151-156). Amsterdam: IOS Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Classification of Collaboration Levels for Human-Robot Cooperation in Manufacturing
2018 (English)In: Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXII: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 11–13, 2018,  University of Skövde, Sweden / [ed] Peter Thorvald, Keith Case, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2018, p. 151-156Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Industry 4.0 aims to support the factory of the future, which involves increased amounts of information systems and new ways of using automation. One new usage is collaboration between human and industrial robot in manufacturing, with both partners sharing work on a single task. Supporting human-robot collaboration (HRC) requires understanding the requirements of HRC as well as the differences to existing approaches where the goal is more automation, such as in the case of self-driving cars. We propose a framework that we call levels of collaboration to support this, and posit that this framework supports a mental model conducive to the design of lines incorporating HRC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2018
Series
Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, ISSN 2352-751X, E-ISSN 2352-7528 ; 8
Keywords
Human-robot collaboration, Manufacturing, Industry 4.0
National Category
Robotics
Research subject
INF302 Autonomous Intelligent Systems; User Centred Product Design; Interaction Lab (ILAB); INF202 Virtual Ergonomics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16117 (URN)10.3233/978-1-61499-902-7-151 (DOI)2-s2.0-85057431589 (Scopus ID)978-1-61499-901-0 (ISBN)978-1-61499-902-7 (ISBN)
Conference
16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 11–13, 2018, University of Skövde, Sweden
Projects
KK-stiftelsen AIR - SIDUS nr 20140220ManuWork (EU) nr 723711
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 723711Knowledge Foundation, 20140220
Note

Detta arbete är finansierat både av AIR(KK)  och ManuWork (EU).

Available from: 2018-08-31 Created: 2018-08-31 Last updated: 2019-02-14Bibliographically approved
Lundström, C. & Lindblom, J. (2018). Considering farmers' situated knowledge of using agricultural decision support systems (AgriDSS) to Foster farming practices: The case of CropSAT. Agricultural Systems, 159, 9-20
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Considering farmers' situated knowledge of using agricultural decision support systems (AgriDSS) to Foster farming practices: The case of CropSAT
2018 (English)In: Agricultural Systems, ISSN 0308-521X, E-ISSN 1873-2267, Vol. 159, p. 9-20Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Precision agriculture is an important part of the sustainable intensification of agriculture, where information and communications technology and other technologies are necessary, but not sufficient for sustainable farming systems. The technology must fit into farmers' practice and be handled by their experienced-based, situated knowledge in order to contribute to increased sustainability in their farming. This study analysed the relationship between farmers' experience-based situated knowledge and the use of agricultural decision support systems in order to develop care by farmers in their practice. The theoretical framework of distributed cognition was used as a lens when investigating and analysing farmers' use of an agricultural decision support system called CropSAT developed for calculation of variable rate application files for nitrogen fertilisation from satellite images. In the case study, the unit of analysis was broadened to the whole socio-technical system of farmers' decision-making and learning, including other people and different kinds of tools and artefacts. The results revealed that social contexts could support farmers' development of cognitive strategies for use of agricultural decision support systems, e.g. CropSAT, and could thus facilitate decision-making and learning through development of enhanced professional vision that hopefully may increase farmers' situated knowledge and care in PA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018
Keywords
Precision agriculture, Agricultural decision support systems, Sustainable intensification, Distributed cognition, Learning, Care
National Category
Interaction Technologies
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-14251 (URN)10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.004 (DOI)000419415700002 ()2-s2.0-85031121584 (Scopus ID)
Projects
Biological Soil Mapping (BioSoM) at NJ Faculty, SLU ua Fe 2012.5.1-3936, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Note

This work was financially supported by the thematic research programme Biological Soil Mapping (BioSoM) at NJ Faculty, SLU ua Fe 2012.5.1-3936, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

Available from: 2017-10-24 Created: 2017-10-24 Last updated: 2018-02-16Bibliographically approved
Alenljung, B., Andreasson, R., Lowe, R., Billing, E. & Lindblom, J. (2018). Conveying Emotions by Touch to the Nao Robot: A User Experience Perspective. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(4), Article ID 82.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Conveying Emotions by Touch to the Nao Robot: A User Experience Perspective
Show others...
2018 (English)In: Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, ISSN 2414-4088, Vol. 2, no 4, article id 82Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Social robots are expected gradually to be used by more and more people in a widerrange of settings, domestic as well as professional. As a consequence, the features and qualityrequirements on human–robot interaction will increase, comprising possibilities to communicateemotions, establishing a positive user experience, e.g., using touch. In this paper, the focus is ondepicting how humans, as the users of robots, experience tactile emotional communication with theNao Robot, as well as identifying aspects affecting the experience and touch behavior. A qualitativeinvestigation was conducted as part of a larger experiment. The major findings consist of 15 differentaspects that vary along one or more dimensions and how those influence the four dimensions ofuser experience that are present in the study, as well as the different parts of touch behavior ofconveying emotions.

National Category
Interaction Technologies
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB); INF302 Autonomous Intelligent Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16507 (URN)10.3390/mti2040082 (DOI)
Funder
Region Västra GötalandKnowledge Foundation, 20140220
Available from: 2018-12-18 Created: 2018-12-18 Last updated: 2019-02-15Bibliographically approved
Lundström, C. & Lindblom, J. (2018). Motivations and needs for adoption of the agricultural decision support system CropSAT in advisory services. Paper presented at European Seminar on Extension and Education (ESEE). Transformative learning: New directions in Agricultural Extension and Education. Chania, Greece, July 4-7, 2017.. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 71-82
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Motivations and needs for adoption of the agricultural decision support system CropSAT in advisory services
2018 (English)In: International Journal of Agricultural Extension, ISSN 2311-8547, p. 71-82Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper presents several strategies employed by advisors in relation to the use of a Swedish agricultural decision support system (AgriDSS) called CropSAT, which is free to use and funded by the Swedish Board of Agriculture. The research questions for the study were: How is extension affected and possibly altered when provided with CropSAT? 2) How can advisory strategies in relation to PA technology use be categorised? Fourteen crop production advisors were interviewed, and the collected data were analysed thematically. The findings revealed four different extension strategies in relation to CropSAT use: 1) I do not use it, 2) I use it if I have to, 3) I use it myself and tell the farmer how to fertilise, and 4) I use it with the farmer. The obtained results indicate that the strategies selected by the advisors varied based on the requests and needs of farmers, the advisors’ personal interests and competences, CropSAT functionality, and uncertainty about how to use it in practice. When using an AgriDSS such as CropSAT in advisory situations, the complexity increases because there are more parameters to consider, and thus it could be experienced as more difficult to make proper decisions. As a result of the combination of technology and agronomy, the advisors requested more support. We argue that this request must be met by research, the authorities and the companies responsible for developing the AgriDSS. We claim that in order to increase the use of AgriDSS to optimise crop treatment at the right time and on the smallest possible scale, there is a need for a change in mind-set by among both advisors and farmers in order to increase sustainability in agriculture.

Keywords
Precision agriculture, advisor, fertilisation, crop production, agricultural decision support systems (AgriDSS), situated seeing
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-15029 (URN)
Conference
European Seminar on Extension and Education (ESEE). Transformative learning: New directions in Agricultural Extension and Education. Chania, Greece, July 4-7, 2017.
Available from: 2018-04-11 Created: 2018-04-11 Last updated: 2018-05-03Bibliographically approved
Messina Dahlberg, G., Lindblom, J., Montebelli, A. & Billing, E. (2018). Negotiating epistemic spaces for dialogue across disciplines in higher education: The case of the Pepper experiment. In: EARLI, Joint SIG10-21 Conference, 2018, Luxembourg, 2018: . Paper presented at European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Joint SIG10-21 Conference, 2018, Luxembourg, 30–31 August 2018. Luxembourg
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Negotiating epistemic spaces for dialogue across disciplines in higher education: The case of the Pepper experiment
2018 (English)In: EARLI, Joint SIG10-21 Conference, 2018, Luxembourg, 2018, Luxembourg, 2018Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luxembourg: , 2018
National Category
Learning Pedagogy Human Aspects of ICT
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16120 (URN)
Conference
European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Joint SIG10-21 Conference, 2018, Luxembourg, 30–31 August 2018
Available from: 2018-09-06 Created: 2018-09-06 Last updated: 2019-03-19Bibliographically approved
Montebelli, A. & Lindblom, J. (2018). On Transferring Crafting Intentions from Humans to Robots: A Message to Manufacturers of the (Near) Future. In: Peter Thorvald, Keith Case (Ed.), Peter Thorvald, Keith Case (Ed.), Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXII: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 11–13, 2018, University of Skövde, Sweden. Paper presented at 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR 2018), Skövde, Sweden, on 11-13 September 2018 (pp. 163-168). Amsterdam: IOS Press
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On Transferring Crafting Intentions from Humans to Robots: A Message to Manufacturers of the (Near) Future
2018 (English)In: Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXXII: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research, incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research, September 11–13, 2018, University of Skövde, Sweden / [ed] Peter Thorvald, Keith Case, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2018, p. 163-168Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Our present work aligns three results from previous robotics research in simultaneous kinesthetic teaching of spatial and force/torque requirements for “in-contact” tasks, to highlight the endeavor towards the creation of safe, flexible, cost effective, confidential, natural programming interfaces, a crucial tool for the manufacturing domain of the future. The tasks that we here consider overarch different dimensions of complexity, from writing with a marker on a white slate to using a wood plane. Eventually, incrementally assisted kinesthetic teaching (IAKT) allows human experts to refine their demonstrations under modulated robotic assistance, thus converging, by a limit process constituted of a sequence of sub-perfect individual demonstrations, towards the “ideal” crafting intention, i.e. the humanly unreachable, perfect execution of the task. In the closing discussion, we demonstrate how this approach can find space in contemporary industrial and SMSE manufacturing, in order to aim for improved production quality and performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2018
Series
Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, ISSN 2352-751X, E-ISSN 2352-7528 ; 8
Keywords
physical human-robot interaction, human-robot collaboration, crafting intention, kinesthetic teaching
National Category
Robotics
Research subject
INF302 Autonomous Intelligent Systems; Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16118 (URN)10.3233/978-1-61499-902-7-163 (DOI)2-s2.0-85057402217 (Scopus ID)978-1-61499-901-0 (ISBN)978-1-61499-902-7 (ISBN)
Conference
16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR 2018), Skövde, Sweden, on 11-13 September 2018
Funder
Knowledge Foundation, 20140220
Note

This book presents the proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Manufacturing Research incorporating the 33rd National Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR 2018), held in Skövde, Sweden, on 11-13 September 2018.

Available from: 2018-08-31 Created: 2018-08-31 Last updated: 2019-02-05Bibliographically approved
Nordqvist, M. & Lindblom, J. (2018). Operators' Experience of Trust in Manual Assembly with a Collaborative Robot. In: Michita Imai, Tim Norman, Elizabeth Sklar, Takanori Komatsu (Ed.), HAI '18 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction: . Paper presented at HAI2018, 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. Southampton, United Kingdom, December 15-18, 2018 (pp. 341-343). New York, NY, USA: ACM Digital Library
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Operators' Experience of Trust in Manual Assembly with a Collaborative Robot
2018 (English)In: HAI '18 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction / [ed] Michita Imai, Tim Norman, Elizabeth Sklar, Takanori Komatsu, New York, NY, USA: ACM Digital Library, 2018, p. 341-343Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Advancements in human-robot collaboration (HRC) are major aspects of the future Industry 4.0. HRC entails humans that cooperatively work with fenceless robots in dynamic, changing, and rather unpredictable settings where they should assist and learn from each other and automatically respond to changes [1]. The envisioning of smart factories of the future results in new and additional challenges for how to evaluate various aspects of the collaboration between the human operator and the robot. The common practice in HRC is to focus on safety and performance-related issues, which are highly influenced by human factors (HF). Because of the prevailing orientation towards HF, HRC runs the risk of not considering the modern understandings of human cognition and technology-mediated activity in a socio-material context [2]. Previous research reveals that safety is a necessary but not sufficient condition for avoiding accidents between humans and robots.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York, NY, USA: ACM Digital Library, 2018
Keywords
Industry 4.0, User Experience, Evaluation, Trust, Human-Robot Collaboration, UX testing
National Category
Interaction Technologies
Research subject
INF201 Virtual Production Development; INF302 Autonomous Intelligent Systems; Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16529 (URN)10.1145/3284432.3287180 (DOI)000457793300051 ()2-s2.0-85060674802 (Scopus ID)978-1-4503-5953-5 (ISBN)
Conference
HAI2018, 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. Southampton, United Kingdom, December 15-18, 2018
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 637107Knowledge Foundation
Note

Publikationen är även finansierad av KK-Stiftelsen SIDUS-AIR 20140220 (Action and Intention Recognition in Human Interaction with Autonomous Systems)

Available from: 2018-12-21 Created: 2018-12-21 Last updated: 2019-02-22Bibliographically approved
Lindblom, J. & Kjellström, A. (2018). Pedagogisk meritering och pedagogisk karriärstege utifrån ett akademiskt lärarskap. In: NU2018 - Det akademiska lärarskapet: . Paper presented at NU2018 - Det akademiska lärarskapet, Västerås, 9-11 oktober, 2018. , Article ID 829.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Pedagogisk meritering och pedagogisk karriärstege utifrån ett akademiskt lärarskap
2018 (Swedish)In: NU2018 - Det akademiska lärarskapet, 2018, article id 829Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [sv]

Det är allmänt vedertaget att högre utbildning har flera olika syften, bland annat att förbereda studenterna för ett aktivt medborgarskap, framtida yrkesliv, anställningsbarhet samt bidra till personlig utveckling. För att kunna nå upp till dessa syften behöver det finnas en pedagogisk praktik inom högre utbildning som främjar ett vetenskapligt förhållningssätt till studenternas lärande. Från ett studentperspektiv driver Sveriges förenade studentkårer (SFS) [1] ett arbete för att främja förutsättningar för en god undervisning vid högskolestudier. Ett sätt att främja det systematiska kvalitetsarbetet är att fokusera på pedagogisk meritering av lärare. I arbetet med att revidera samt vidareutveckla innehållet i och processerna för pedagogisk meritering vid lärosätet har utgångspunkten varit att meritera engagerade, kunniga och ämneskompetenta lärare med hänsyn till lärargärningens olika möjligheter och begräsningar för att bedriva ett systematiskt kvalitetsutvecklingsarbete. Det övergripande syftet för lärosätets modell för pedagogisk karriärstege är att bidra till den excellenta lärmiljön genom kvalitetsdrivande högskolepedagogiska processer i högre utbildning. Målet med den pedagogiska karriärstegen är att kompetensutveckla och bedöma ämneskunniga lärares skicklighet i att bedriva pedagogisk verksamhet i praktiken. Detta kan exempelvis ske genom att stimulera lärare att utveckla en hög pedagogisk kompetens, stimulera lärosätet och institutionerna att skapa goda förutsättningar för pedagogisk utveckling samt uppmärksamma och premiera hög högskolepedagogisk kompetens hos undervisande personal.

Motiveringen till att utgå ifrån begreppet akademiskt lärarskap (eng. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning [2], SoTL) för den reviderade pedagogiska karriärstegen är att den är i linje med Sveriges universitets- och högskoleförbunds (SUHF:s) uppdaterade rekommendation [3] om mål för behörighetsgivande högskolepedagogisk utbildning samt ömsesidigt erkännande (Rek 2016:1).

I vårt bidrag åskådliggörs det akademiska lärarskapet utifrån ett högskoleperspektiv, med utgångspunkt i processen att revidera och förankra synen på pedagogisk meritering och denpedagogiska karriärstegen vid lärosätet. I styrdokumentet ”Riktlinjer för pedagogisk karriärstege vid Högskolan i Skövde” (Dnr HS 2017/405) [4] beskrivs begreppet akademiskt läarskap som ”… att ha ett vetenskapligt förhållningssät till kunskap och kunskapsbildning och vad det innebä att vara lärare i höre utbildning. Det akademiska lärarskapet innebär en kvalitetsdrivande strategi där läraren reflekterar över och argumenterar för sin lärargäning i ett kontinuerligt utvecklingsarbete. Ett akademiskt lärarskap innefattar förutom skicklighet i undervisning och handledning även inslag av pedagogisk kritisk sjävreflektion”. Som ett resultat av det genomförda reviderings- och utvecklingsarbetet har exempelvis begreppet akademiskt lärarskap introducerats i lärosätets utvecklingsplan 2017-2022 [5] samt att ett råd för högskolepedagogisk meritering har inrättats. Vi kommer att beskriva vå utvecklings- och revideringsprocess och beskriva de möjligheter och utmaningar som vi stött på i olika sammanhang under resans gång med att förankra begreppet akademiskt lärarskap i organisationen. Dessutom diskuterar vi våra förväntningar och farhågor under det pågående och framtida arbetet. Vi hoppas att inspirera andra lärosäten som planerar att inrätta någon form av pedagogisk meritering utifrån ett akademiskt lärarskap.

Referenser

[1] https://www.sfs.se/publikation/agenda-pedagogik

[2] Kreber, C. (2002). “Teaching excellence, teaching expertise, and the scholarship of teaching.” Innovative Higher Education, 27(1), pp. 5-23.

[3] REK 2016-1 Mål för behörighetsgivande högskolepedagogisk utbildning samt ömsesidigt erkännande. Tillgäglig på

http://www.suhf.se/BinaryLoader.axd?OwnerID=f66b107a-bb35-44b1-a4bd-98518d2d6950&OwnerType=0&PropertyName=EmbeddedFile_1937ad3d-3d25-4e4d-8dc5-

9c490b27432e&FileName=REK+2016-

1+Om+beh%c3%b6righetsgivande+h%c3%b6gskolepedagogisk+utbildning_Dnr+024-16.pdf&Attachment=True

[4] http://www.his.se/Policies/Forskning_utbildning_forskningsniva/Riktlinjer%20pedagogisk%20meritering%20-%20beslutad.pdf

[5] http://www.his.se/Policies/StrategierKvalitetOrganisation/utvecklingsplan_for_his_2017_2022.pdf

National Category
Pedagogical Work
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB); Individual and Society VIDSOC
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16345 (URN)
Conference
NU2018 - Det akademiska lärarskapet, Västerås, 9-11 oktober, 2018
Available from: 2018-10-28 Created: 2018-10-28 Last updated: 2018-12-12Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-0946-7531

Search in DiVA

Show all publications