his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Publikasjoner (10 av 85) Visa alla publikasjoner
Andersson, T., Cäker, M., Tengblad, S. & Wickelgren, M. (2019). Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(1), 36-45
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Scandinavian Journal of Management, ISSN 0956-5221, E-ISSN 1873-3387, Vol. 35, nr 1, s. 36-45Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper describes and explains how balancing organizational structures can build traits for organizational resilience. Organizational resilience is a holistic and complex concept. In this paper, we move beyond focusing on sudden and disruptive events in favour of anticipating the unexpected in daily organizing. Organizational resilience is understood here as building traits of risk awareness, preference for cooperation, agility and improvisation and is analysed by means of a longitudinal qualitative case study. The paper contributes to the field by showing how balancing organizational structures can foster organizational resilience traits. We show that power distribution and normative control can create preparedness for unexpected events and foster action orientation at the same time as supporting organizational alignment. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2019
Emneord
balancing, decentralization, organizational resilience, organizational structure, risk awareness
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16593 (URN)10.1016/j.scaman.2019.01.001 (DOI)000461263700004 ()2-s2.0-85060316460 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-02-04 Laget: 2019-02-04 Sist oppdatert: 2019-04-23bibliografisk kontrollert
Eriksson, E., Andersson, T., Hellström, A., Gadolin, C. & Lifvergren, S. (2019). Collaborative Public Management: Coordinated Value Propositions among Public Service Organisations. Public Management Review
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Collaborative Public Management: Coordinated Value Propositions among Public Service Organisations
Vise andre…
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Public Management Review, ISSN 1471-9037, E-ISSN 1471-9045Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Drawing from collaborative public management, this article seeks to contribute topublic service logic by focusing on what precedes the public service user’s realizationof value: the value proposition. A new care model for elderly people with multiplechronic diseases shows that coordinators with an inter-organizational mission, ver-tical and horizontal supporting structures, trust established through relationships,and recognition of service systems’embeddedness in social systems are pivotal forthe ability of public service organizations to develop coordinated value propositions.The contribution to policy and practice is an increased understanding of a coherent,rather than fragmented, welfare system for users/citizens.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Taylor & Francis, 2019
Emneord
Collaborative public management, public service logic, value proposition, service system, social system
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16723 (URN)10.1080/14719037.2019.1604793 (DOI)2-s2.0-85065339674 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-03-26 Laget: 2019-03-26 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-04
Gustavsson, S. M. K. & Andersson, T. (2019). Patient involvement 2.0: Experience-based co-design supported by action research. Action Research, 17(4), 469-491
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Patient involvement 2.0: Experience-based co-design supported by action research
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Action Research, ISSN 1476-7503, E-ISSN 1741-2617, Vol. 17, nr 4, s. 469-491Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Strong professionals who influence the development of healthcare services have dominated healthcare organizations for many years. However, this dominance has been challenged recently through patient involvement. One method of achieving patient involvement is experience-based co-design (EBCD), in which patients and healthcare professionals work together to improve care. Patient involvement has considerable potential, but also presents certain challenges. This article addresses these challenges using experiences from patients and healthcare professionals who participated in two action research (AR) projects that aimed to improve patient experienced quality using EBCD. The paper shows that patient involvement in quality improvements challenge the traditional roles of professionals and patients. The role as codesigner embraces new perspectives for healthcare professionals that force them to step out of their comfort zone. Accordingly, healthcare professionals are able to view patients as equal partners in improvement work. Reflecting dialogues offered eye-opening stories for patients and healthcare professionals that enabled them to construct a common picture of care. This study contributes to earlier research that argues that an AR approach can strengthen important values for EBCD projects. The findings show that the combination of EBCD and AR is a promising approach to address the challenges of patient involvement in healthcare improvement.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Sage Publications, 2019
Emneord
patient involvement, experience-based co-design, action research, improvements, pediatrics, professions
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-14391 (URN)10.1177/1476750317723965 (DOI)000502283900004 ()2-s2.0-85077208581 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2015-00822
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-11-11 Laget: 2017-11-11 Sist oppdatert: 2020-01-10bibliografisk kontrollert
Eriksson, E. M., Hellström, A., Andersson, T., Gadolin, C., Lifvergren, S. & Conradi, N. (2019). Post-New Public Management in Public Healthcare: Recycled, Hybridized, Paradigmatic?. In: : . Paper presented at British Academy of Management (BAM) 2019 Conference, Aston University, Birmingham, September 3-5, 2019 (pp. 1-23). British Academy of Management
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Post-New Public Management in Public Healthcare: Recycled, Hybridized, Paradigmatic?
Vise andre…
2019 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Publicerat paper (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

New Public Management (NPM) is increasingly used pejoratively and claimed unfit for the complex challenges in contemporary societies, for example aging population structures and, as a result, increased number of cancer patients. Consequently, post-NPM gains increased attention. Drawing from a longitudinal case in Swedish cancer care, the present article seeks to pinpoint post-NPM in public healthcare practice. It is revealed that some post-NPM aspects are recycled by combining traditional public administration (pre-NPM) and NPM aspects: the former’s re-professionalisation is combined with the latter’s foci on performance measures, decentralisation, and accountability. Other post-NPM aspects are hybridizing typical NPM aspects with new (post-NPM) aspects: for instance, customer-focus is taken further to include the patient’s active participation in co-designing services, and standardization is reinterpreted to concern meeting-places rather than efficiency. Yet other aspects are replacing NPM shortcomings: for instance, trust is replacing control, and a systems approach is replacing the intra-organisational focus.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
British Academy of Management, 2019
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16921 (URN)978-0-9956413-2-7 (ISBN)
Konferanse
British Academy of Management (BAM) 2019 Conference, Aston University, Birmingham, September 3-5, 2019
Merknad

Paper Type: Full Papers

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-05-27 Laget: 2019-05-27 Sist oppdatert: 2019-11-08bibliografisk kontrollert
Andersson, T., Gadolin, C. & Stockhult, H. (2019). Samverkan i komplexitet: Resultat från utvärdering av samverkansmodell social hållbarhet/folkhälsa. Skövde
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Samverkan i komplexitet: Resultat från utvärdering av samverkansmodell social hållbarhet/folkhälsa
2019 (svensk)Rapport (Annet vitenskapelig)
sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Skövde: , 2019. s. 31
Emneord
samverkan, komplexitet, offentliga organisationer, social hållbarhet, folkhälsa
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-18014 (URN)
Prosjekter
Utvärdering av samverkansmodell social hållbarhet/folkhälsa
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-12-16 Laget: 2019-12-16 Sist oppdatert: 2020-01-24bibliografisk kontrollert
Alvehus, J. & Andersson, T. (2018). A New Professional Landscape: Entangled Institutional Logics in Two Swedish Welfare Professions. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 8(3), 91-109
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>A New Professional Landscape: Entangled Institutional Logics in Two Swedish Welfare Professions
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, ISSN 2245-0157, E-ISSN 2245-0157, Vol. 8, nr 3, s. 91-109Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous research has made three parallel but incompatible observations on the contemporary development of welfare professions: loss of professional autonomy, hybridization, and maintained autonomy.  Yet,  research  providing  contextual  understanding  of  the  simultaneous  occurrence  of  these three observations is lacking. The aim of this theoretical paper is to identify and explain seemingly  contradictory  coexisting  features  of  modern  welfare  professions  through  a  compre-hensive reading of current literature on the health care and teaching professions in Sweden. The literature  has  demonstrated  entangled  institutional  logics,  in  which  simultaneous  but  differing  effects occur, thereby developing a new professional landscape.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2018
Emneord
Institutional logics, New Public Management, Professionalism, Professions, Sweden
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16298 (URN)10.18291/njwls.v8i3.109542 (DOI)000445934700006 ()2-s2.0-85054669912 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-10-15 Laget: 2018-10-15 Sist oppdatert: 2019-02-11bibliografisk kontrollert
Gadolin, C., Andersson, T., Hellström, A. & Eriksson, E. (2018). Alternative Value Configuration Models in Healthcare and Its Effect on Professional Fulfillment. In: : . Paper presented at 5th Interdisciplinary Nordic Research Conference on Interactions Between Professions, Organization and the Quality of Healthcare (IPOQ), Oslo, January 22-23, 2018.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Alternative Value Configuration Models in Healthcare and Its Effect on Professional Fulfillment
2018 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Fagfellevurdert)
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-14666 (URN)
Konferanse
5th Interdisciplinary Nordic Research Conference on Interactions Between Professions, Organization and the Quality of Healthcare (IPOQ), Oslo, January 22-23, 2018
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-01-19 Laget: 2018-01-19 Sist oppdatert: 2018-05-08bibliografisk kontrollert
Andersson, T. (2018). Att leda genom medarbetarskap i vården. Cancervården (1), 16-17
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Att leda genom medarbetarskap i vården
2018 (svensk)Inngår i: Cancervården, ISSN 1401-6583, nr 1, s. 16-17Artikkel i tidsskrift (Annet (populærvitenskap, debatt, mm)) Published
sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Stockholm: Riksföreningen sjuksköterskor i cancervård, 2018
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-15102 (URN)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-04-27 Laget: 2018-04-27 Sist oppdatert: 2019-10-09bibliografisk kontrollert
Eriksson, E., Hellström, A., Andersson, T. & Gadolin, C. (2018). Beyond Sickcare: Collaborative Value Creation Emphasizing Health in Healthcare. In: : . Paper presented at 22nd Annual International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) Conference, Edinburgh, April 11-13, 2018.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Beyond Sickcare: Collaborative Value Creation Emphasizing Health in Healthcare
2018 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Fagfellevurdert)
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-14791 (URN)
Konferanse
22nd Annual International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM) Conference, Edinburgh, April 11-13, 2018
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-03-05 Laget: 2018-03-05 Sist oppdatert: 2018-05-09bibliografisk kontrollert
Andersson, T. & Liff, R. (2018). Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(2), 71-87
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Professions and Organization, ISSN 2051-8803, E-ISSN 2051-8811, Vol. 5, nr 2, s. 71-87Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Researchers working under the institutional logics perspective find the struggle between managerial logic and various professional logics one of the most intriguing issues in healthcare organizations. Previous research provided several explanations at both the organizational level (mediation, hybridization, and selective coupling) and the individual actor level (hierarchization, sense making, reinterpretation, and hijacking) for the coexistence of professional and managerial logics in healthcare. However, all of these explanations are based on the underlying institutional logics not changing. In this article, we show that co-optation can explain the coexistence of institutional logics, but that it also causes the underlying institutional logics to change. Co-optation means that an actor adopts a strategic element from another logic that retains the most important elements of its own logic. Empirically, this article illustrates co-optation processes through a qualitative study of outpatient units in child and adolescent psychiatric care in Sweden. Using an institutional logics framework, we describe and explain how managers co-opted elements of professional logics and professionals co-opted elements of managerial logic in their attempts to support their own interests. Even if co-optation is performed to protect the home logic, the co-opted elements ultimately change it. This study contributes to the institutional logics framework by describing and explaining how co-optation can be a dynamic response to competing logics at the individual actor level.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Oxford University Press, 2018
Emneord
co-optation, healthcare, institutional logics, managers, professionals
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16019 (URN)10.1093/jpo/joy001 (DOI)000438240400001 ()2-s2.0-85053808431 (Scopus ID)
Prosjekter
Forte 2015-00822 Verksamhetsutvecklarnas roll i vårdens utvecklingsarbete
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-07-27 Laget: 2018-07-27 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-04bibliografisk kontrollert
Organisasjoner
Identifikatorer
ORCID-id: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-1989-2745