his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
BETA
Alternativa namn
Publikasjoner (10 av 49) Visa alla publikasjoner
Kajonius, P. & Johnson, J. (2019). Assessing the Structure of the Five Factor Model of Personality (IPIP-NEO-120) in the Public Domain. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 260-275
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Assessing the Structure of the Five Factor Model of Personality (IPIP-NEO-120) in the Public Domain
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Europe's Journal of Psychology, ISSN 1841-0413, E-ISSN 1841-0413, Vol. 15, nr 2, s. 260-275Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Assessment of individual differences in personality traits is arguably one of the hallmarks of psychological research. Testing the structural validity of trait measurements is paramount in this endeavor. In the current study, we investigated 30 facet traits in one of the accessible and comprehensive public-domain Five Factor Model (FFM) personality inventories, IPIP-NEO-120 (Johnson, 2014), using one of the largest US samples to date (N = 320,128). We present structural loadings for all trait facets organized into respective FFM-trait domain (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness). Both hierarchical second-order and bi-factor models showed tolerable model fit indices, using confirmatory factor analysis in a structural equation modeling (SEM) framework. Some facet traits were substantially more representative than others for their respective trait domain, which facilitate further discussions on FFM-construct content. We conclude that IPIP-NEO is sufficiently structurally robust for future use, for the benefit of research and practice in personality assessment.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
PsychOpen, 2019
Emneord
personality, structure, Five Factor Model, IPIP
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16382 (URN)10.5964/ejop.v15i2.1671 (DOI)000470731400006 ()2-s2.0-85068748812 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-11-11 Laget: 2018-11-11 Sist oppdatert: 2019-08-06
Persson, B. N., Kajonius, P. J. & Garcia, D. (2019). Revisiting the Structure of the Short Dark Triad. Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 26(1), 3-16
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Revisiting the Structure of the Short Dark Triad
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), ISSN 1073-1911, E-ISSN 1552-3489, Vol. 26, nr 1, s. 3-16Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

In the past decade, extensive interest has been directed toward the Dark Triad (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy), popularly assessed by the Short Dark Triad (SD3). Nevertheless, relatively little research has been conducted on the SD3's factor structure. We investigated the SD3's psychometric properties in three studies with three independent samples, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses ( N1 = 1,487; N2 = 17,740; N3 = 496). In all three studies, Machiavellianism and psychopathy items displayed large general factor loadings, and narcissism larger specific factor loadings. In subsequent studies, two- and three-factor models fitted the data similarly, with the best fitting model being a bifactor model with items from Machiavellianism and psychopathy modelled as one specific factor, and narcissism as a second specific factor. On this basis, we suggest that the SD3 does not seem to capture the different mental processes theorized to underlie the similar behaviors generated by Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Additionally, we recommend the use of a single SD3 composite score, and not subscale scores, as subscales contain small amounts of reliable variance beyond the general factor.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Sage Publications, 2019
Emneord
Dark Triad, SD3, factor analysis, psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13453 (URN)10.1177/1073191117701192 (DOI)000453103900001 ()28382846 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85019867160 (Scopus ID)
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council, Dnr. 2015-01229
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-03-24 Laget: 2017-03-24 Sist oppdatert: 2019-01-02bibliografisk kontrollert
Kajonius, P. J. (2019). The Future of Personalized Care: Scientific, Measurement, and Practical Advancements in Personality and Brain Disorders (1ed.). In: Danilo Garcia, Trevor Archer, Richard M. Kostrzewa (Ed.), Personality and Brain Disorders: Associations and Interventions (pp. 269-281). Springer
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>The Future of Personalized Care: Scientific, Measurement, and Practical Advancements in Personality and Brain Disorders
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Personality and Brain Disorders: Associations and Interventions / [ed] Danilo Garcia, Trevor Archer, Richard M. Kostrzewa, Springer, 2019, 1, s. 269-281Kapittel i bok, del av antologi (Fagfellevurdert)
Abstract [en]

Background: Person-centered care sciences are experiencing rapid progress. Personalization in care services is becoming the norm, and implementation from scientific knowledge is increasingly acknowledged and mandated. Advances in personality and brain disorder research are crucial in assisting the future development of personalized care.  

Aim: We will attempt to present glimpses into the future of personalized care with support from frontline science, measurement, and practice, updating with input from personality genetics and measurement theory.

Outline: We present three broad developments: 1) Scientific advancements in understanding how personality and genetics are central in predicting mental health and disorders, with the potential to increase predictive diagnosis and treatment validity 2) Measurement advancements with help of trait dimensions and latent structures, with the potential to increase reliability in assessing personalized care needs and functioning 3) Practical advancements in implementing a personalized approach in care services, with the potential to increase effectiveness and satisfaction with patients. We review this glimpse into the future by referencing key findings in personality and assessment meta-analyses, Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), and trait measurements in psychiatric disorders.

Conclusion: Personalizing care services will benefit practitioners and patients. We suggest and recommend that personalized care diagnosis and treatment is the way forward, and that the future will be potentially revolutionized by incorporating the presented advancements in personality research and brain sciences.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2019 Opplag: 1
Serie
Contemporary Clinical Neuroscience
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16385 (URN)10.1007/978-3-319-90065-0_12 (DOI)978-3-319-90064-3 (ISBN)978-3-319-90065-0 (ISBN)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-11-12 Laget: 2018-11-12 Sist oppdatert: 2019-06-12bibliografisk kontrollert
Kajonius, P. J. & Björkman, T. (2018). Dark malevolent traits and everyday perceived stress. Current Psychology
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Dark malevolent traits and everyday perceived stress
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Current Psychology, ISSN 1046-1310, E-ISSN 1936-4733Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Stress is a factor that greatly impacts our lives. Previous research has examined individual differences in relation to stress. However, research regarding malevolent personality traits in relation to how stress is perceived is limited. The purpose of thepresent study was to investigate relationships between dark malevolent personality traits; psychopathy (EPA), Machiavellianism(MACH-IV), vulnerable narcissism (HSNS), grandiose narcissism (NPI-13), and perceived stress (PSS-10) in a communitysample (N = 346). The results showed a strong positive relationship between vulnerable narcissism and perceived stress, whilegrandiose narcissism and psychopathy showed a small negative relationship with perceived stress. The discussion centers on thatnarcissism should be treated as two separate traits, and that psychopathy and Machiavellianism overlap in relation to theexperience of stress in everyday life.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Springer, 2018
Emneord
dark triad, stress, personality
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16257 (URN)10.1007/s12144-018-9948-x (DOI)2-s2.0-85051428745 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-10-01 Laget: 2018-10-01 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-04bibliografisk kontrollert
Garcia, D., Persson, B., Al Nima, A., Gruneau Brulin, J., Rapp-Ricciardia, M. & Kajonius, P. J. (2018). IRT analyses of the Swedish Dark Triad Dirty Dozen. Heliyon, 4(3), Article ID e00569.
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>IRT analyses of the Swedish Dark Triad Dirty Dozen
Vise andre…
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Heliyon, ISSN 2405-8440, Vol. 4, nr 3, artikkel-id e00569Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2018
Emneord
Psychology, Psychiatry, Clinical psychology
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-14951 (URN)10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00569 (DOI)000432033900018 ()2-s2.0-85043592571 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-03-09 Laget: 2018-03-09 Sist oppdatert: 2018-05-31
Kajonius, P. & Johnson, J. (2018). Sex differences in 30 facets of the five factor model of personality in the large public (N = 320,128). Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 126-130
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Sex differences in 30 facets of the five factor model of personality in the large public (N = 320,128)
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: Personality and Individual Differences, ISSN 0191-8869, E-ISSN 1873-3549, Vol. 129, s. 126-130Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The present study reports on the scope and size of sex differences in 30 personality facet traits, using one of the largest US samples to date (N = 320,128). The study was one of the first to utilize the open access version of the Five-Factor Model of personality (IPIP-NEO-120) in the large public. Overall, across age-groups 19–69 years old, women scored notably higher than men in Agreeableness (d = 0.58) and Neuroticism (d = 0.40). Specifically, women scored d > 0.50 in facet traits Anxiety, Vulnerability, Openness to Emotions, Altruism, and Sympathy, while men only scored slightly higher (d > 0.20) than women in facet traits Excitement-seeking and Openness to Intellect. Sex gaps in the five trait domains were fairly constant across all age-groups, with the exception for age-group 19–29 years old. The discussion centers on how to interpret effects sizes in sex differences in personality traits, and tentative consequences. 

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2018
Emneord
Five factor model, Measurement, Personality traits, Sex
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-15000 (URN)10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.026 (DOI)000430901600023 ()2-s2.0-85044000162 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-04-01 Laget: 2018-04-03 Sist oppdatert: 2018-10-09bibliografisk kontrollert
Mac Giolla, E. & Kajonius, P. J. (2018). Sex differences in personality are larger in gender equal countries: Replicating and extending a surprising finding. International Journal of Psychology
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Sex differences in personality are larger in gender equal countries: Replicating and extending a surprising finding
2018 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Psychology, ISSN 0020-7594, E-ISSN 1464-066XArtikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Sex differences in personality have been shown to be larger in more gender equal countries. We advance this researchby using an extensive personality measure, the IPIP-NEO-120, with large country samples (N > 1000), from 22countries. Furthermore, to capture the multidimensionality of personality we measure sex differences with a multivariateeffect size (Mahalanobis distance D). Results indicate that past research, using univariate measures of effect size, haveunderestimated the size of between-country sex differences in personality. Confirming past research, there was a strongcorrelation (r = .69) between a country’s sex differences in personality and their Gender Equality Index. Additionalanalyses showed that women typically score higher than men on all five trait factors (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness), and that these relative differences are larger in more gender equal countries. Wespeculate that as gender equality increases both men and women gravitate towards their traditional gender roles.

Emneord
personality, big five, sex differences, gender equality, country comparisons
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-16256 (URN)10.1002/ijop.12529 (DOI)30206941 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85053411189 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2018-10-01 Laget: 2018-10-01 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-05bibliografisk kontrollert
Kajonius, P. J. & Dåderman, A. M. (2017). Conceptualizations of Personality Disorders with the Five Factor Model-count and Empathy Traits. International Journal of Testing, 17(2), 141-157
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Conceptualizations of Personality Disorders with the Five Factor Model-count and Empathy Traits
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Testing, ISSN 1530-5058, E-ISSN 1532-7574, Vol. 17, nr 2, s. 141-157Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous research has long advocated that emotional and behavioral disorders are related to general personality traits, such as the Five Factor Model (FFM). The addition of section III in the latest Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) recommends that extremity in personality traits together with maladaptive interpersonal functioning, such as lack of empathy, are used for identifying psychopathology and particularly personality disorders (PD). The objective of the present study was to measure dispositions for DSM categories based on normal personality continuums, and to conceptualize these with empathy traits. We used a validated FFM-count method based on the five personality factors (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness), and related these to 4 empathy traits (emphatic concern, perspective-taking, fantasy, and personal distress). The results showed that FFM-based PD scores overall could be conceptualized using only two of the empathy traits, low emphatic concern and high personal distress. Further, specific dispositions for personality disorders were characterized with distinct empathy traits (e.g., histrionic with high fantasy, and paranoid with low perspective-taking). These findings may have both theoretical and practical implications in capturing potential for personality disorders with ease and efficiency.

Emneord
empathy, FFM, personality disorders, personality traits
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13396 (URN)10.1080/15305058.2017.1279164 (DOI)000402241300003 ()2-s2.0-85011277383 (Scopus ID)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-02-17 Laget: 2017-02-17 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-27bibliografisk kontrollert
Kajonius, P. J. (2017). Cross-cultural personality differences between East Asia and Northern Europe in IPIP-NEO. International Journal of Personality Psychology, 3(1), 1-7
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Cross-cultural personality differences between East Asia and Northern Europe in IPIP-NEO
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Personality Psychology, E-ISSN 2451-9243, Vol. 3, nr 1, s. 1-7Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Emneord
personality, structure, measurement invariance, Five Factor Model
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13397 (URN)
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-02-17 Laget: 2017-02-17 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-27bibliografisk kontrollert
Roos, M. & Kajonius, P. J. (2017). Expert validity on non-verbal personality characters. In: Paula Ferreira, Aristides Ferreira, Inês Afonso, & Ana Margarida Veiga Simão (Ed.), 14th Conference on Psychological Assessment, July 5-8, 2017, Lisbon, Portugal: Book of Abstracts. Paper presented at 14th European Conference of Psychological Assessment, Lisbon, Portugal, 5-8 July, 2017 (pp. 81). Lisbon: Faculty of Psychology of the University of Lisbon
Åpne denne publikasjonen i ny fane eller vindu >>Expert validity on non-verbal personality characters
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: 14th Conference on Psychological Assessment, July 5-8, 2017, Lisbon, Portugal: Book of Abstracts / [ed] Paula Ferreira, Aristides Ferreira, Inês Afonso, & Ana Margarida Veiga Simão, Lisbon: Faculty of Psychology of the University of Lisbon , 2017, s. 81-Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Fagfellevurdert)
sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Lisbon: Faculty of Psychology of the University of Lisbon, 2017
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Kognitiv neurovetenskap och filosofi
Identifikatorer
urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13454 (URN)978-972-95069-3-2 (ISBN)
Konferanse
14th European Conference of Psychological Assessment, Lisbon, Portugal, 5-8 July, 2017
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-03-24 Laget: 2017-03-24 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-20bibliografisk kontrollert
Organisasjoner
Identifikatorer
ORCID-id: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-0629-353X